Project Grant: Spring 2024 results
The Project Grant: Spring 2024 competition has approved 373 research grants for a total investment of approximately $325MFootnote 1.
In addition, 68 priority announcement grants were funded for a total amount of $7,600,000 and 5 supplemental prizes were awarded for a total of $210,000.
The 373 grants approved were awarded to 365 individual nominated principal investigators (8 NPIs were awarded two grants). Of the 373 grants, 94 were awarded to early career researchers, and 12 were awarded for Indigenous health research projects.
The average grant size/duration is $870,701 over 4.42 years.
Geographic breakdown
Province | Number of applications submitted | Percent of total applications submitted | Change from historical (% applications) | Number of applications funded | Percent of applications funded | Change from historical (% funded) | Province-specific success rateFootnote * | Average grant amount | Median grant amount |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
British Columbia | 290 | 11.9% | +0.5pp | 50 | 13.4% | +1.4pp | 17.2% | $862,202 | $914,175 |
Alberta | 235 | 9.6% | -0.7pp | 35 | 9.4% | -1.1pp | 14.9% | $815,850 | $895,401 |
Saskatchewan | 34 | 1.4% | -0.3pp | 5 | 1.3% | +0.0pp | 14.7% | $768,825 | $738,225 |
Manitoba | 63 | 2.6% | -0.2pp | 10 | 2.7% | +0.2pp | 15.9% | $983,408 | $1,036,575 |
Ontario | 1,066 | 43.6% | +1.3pp | 163 | 43.7% | +2.0pp | 15.3% | $874,652 | $883,575 |
Québec | 683 | 28.0% | -0.5pp | 109 | 29.2% | -0.2pp | 16.0% | $881,678 | $933,300 |
New Brunswick | 11 | 0.5% | +0.2pp | 1 | 0.3% | +0.2pp | 9.1% | $757,350 | $757,350 |
Nova Scotia | 48 | 2.0% | -0.1pp | 0 | 0.0% | -2.0pp | 0.0% | $0 | $0 |
Newfoundland and Labrador | 13 | 0.5% | -0.1pp | 0 | 0.0% | -0.5pp | 0.0% | $0 | $0 |
Total | 2,443 | 100.0% | 0.0pp | 373 | 100.0% | 0.0pp | 15.3% | $870,701 | $918,000 |
Note: The applications that were approved conditionally will not appear in the detailed funding decisions database until the conditions have been resolved.
Additional details
Category | Number of applications submitted | Percent of total applications submitted | Change from historical (% application) | Number of applications funded | Percent of applications funded | Change from historical (% funded) | Category-specific success rateFootnote * | Average grant amount | Median grant amount |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Early career researchers (ECRs) | 616 | 25.2% | +0.7pp | 94 | 25.2% | +0.4pp | 15.3% | $792,155 | $818,550 |
Mid-career investigators | 907 | 37.1% | -2.5pp | 127 | 34.0% | -4.1pp | 14.0% | $891,597 | $918,000 |
Senior investigators | 916 | 37.5% | +1.8pp | 151 | 40.5% | +3.6pp | 16.5% | $903,077 | $967,725 |
Knowledge users | 3 | 0.1% | -0.1pp | 1 | 0.3% | +0.1pp | 33.3% | $711,450 | $711,450 |
Unknown career stage | 1 | 0.0% | 0.0pp | 0 | 0.0% | -0.1pp | 0.0% | $0 | $0 |
Integrated KT | 610 | 25.0% | +4.4pp | 101 | 27.1% | +7.0pp | 16.6% | $753,506 | $615,825 |
Investigators who identify as female | 886 | 36.3% | +1.4pp | 137 | 36.7% | +0.5pp | 15.5% | $822,553 | $860,625 |
Indigenous Health | 25 | 1.0% | +0.0pp | 12 | 3.2% | +0.3pp | 48.0% | $1,076,100 | $615,825 |
Submitted in French | 49 | 2.0% | +0.6pp | 7 | 1.9% | +0.6pp | 14.3% | $576,482 | $451,350 |
Biomedical | 1,404 | 57.5% | -2.8pp | 213 | 57.1% | -3.9pp | 15.2% | $967,690 | $975,375 |
Clinical | 523 | 21.4% | +0.8pp | 77 | 20.6% | +1.5pp | 14.7% | $838,085 | $684,675 |
Health systems/services | 255 | 10.4% | +1.2pp | 39 | 10.5% | +1.4pp | 15.3% | $585,700 | $478,125 |
Social / Cultural / Environmental / Population Health | 253 | 10.4% | +0.7pp | 43 | 11.5% | +0.8pp | 17.0% | $699,484 | $527,850 |
Streamlining
Only a portion of the Project Grant applications submitted to a competition will ultimately receive funding. It is therefore important for peer review committee members to focus their discussions on the most competitive applications to ensure an accurate comparative evaluation. To help support this goal, a streamlining process is used to remove applications that meet streamlining criteria from the discussion process, thereby allowing committee members more time to judge and discriminate between remaining applications.
Province | Number of applications submitted | Number of applications streamlined | Percent of applications streamlined | Change from historical (% streamlined) | Number of applications discussed | Percent of applications discussed | Change from historical (% discussed) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
British Columbia | 290 | 147 | 50.7% | +8.0pp | 143 | 49.3% | -8.0pp |
Alberta | 235 | 125 | 53.2% | +8.9pp | 110 | 46.8% | -8.9pp |
Saskatchewan | 34 | 18 | 52.9% | -3.9pp | 16 | 47.1% | +3.9pp |
Manitoba | 63 | 38 | 60.3% | +8.2pp | 25 | 39.7% | -8.2pp |
Ontario | 1,066 | 552 | 51.8% | +7.9pp | 514 | 48.2% | -7.9pp |
Québec | 683 | 374 | 54.8% | +11.0pp | 309 | 45.2% | -11.0pp |
New Brunswick | 11 | 9 | 81.8% | +22.3pp | 2 | 18.2% | -22.3pp |
Nova Scotia | 48 | 37 | 77.1% | +28.2pp | 11 | 22.9% | -28.2pp |
Newfoundland and Labrador | 13 | 10 | 76.9% | +17.5pp | 3 | 23.1% | -17.5pp |
Total | 2,443 | 1,310 | 53.6% | +9.2pp | 1,133 | 46.4% | -9.2pp |
Application Breakdown | Number of applications submitted | Number of applications streamlined | Percent of applications streamlined | Change from historical (% streamlined) | Number of applications discussed | Percent of applications discussed | Change from historical (% discussed) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Early career researchers (ECRs) | 616 | 365 | 59.3% | +10.6pp | 251 | 40.7% | -10.6pp |
Mid-career researchers | 907 | 466 | 51.4% | +7.8pp | 441 | 48.6% | -7.8pp |
Senior researchers | 916 | 478 | 52.2% | +9.7pp | 438 | 47.8% | -9.7pp |
Knowledge Users | 3 | 1 | 33.3% | -28.3pp | 2 | 66.7% | +28.3pp |
Unknown career stage | 1 | 0 | 0.0% | -53.8pp | 1 | 100.0% | +53.8pp |
Integrated KT | 610 | 345 | 56.6% | +10.9pp | 265 | 43.4% | -10.9pp |
Researchers who identify as female | 886 | 480 | 54.2% | +10.4pp | 406 | 45.8% | -10.4pp |
Indigenous Health | 25 | 4 | 16.0% | +8.0pp | 21 | 84.0% | -8.0pp |
Submitted in French | 49 | 29 | 59.2% | +11.6pp | 20 | 40.8% | -11.6pp |
Biomedical | 1,404 | 733 | 52.2% | +8.0pp | 671 | 47.8% | -8.0pp |
Clinical | 523 | 294 | 56.2% | +10.7pp | 229 | 43.8% | -10.7pp |
Health systems/services | 255 | 146 | 57.3% | +11.5pp | 109 | 42.7% | -11.5pp |
Social/Cultural/Environmental/Population Health | 253 | 133 | 52.6% | +9.8pp | 120 | 47.4% | -9.8pp |
Foundation grant holders
Foundation grant holders
This is the fourth Project competition that could be applied to by Foundation Grant holders, specifically grant holders from the 2014 and 2015 Foundation Grant competitions. There were 122 applications from current and former Foundation Grant holders coming from 98 unique applicants. There were 33 funded grants awarded to 30 unique Foundation Grant holders.
Panel | Number of unique Foundation Grant holders awarded grants |
---|---|
BE2 | 1 |
BMA | 1 |
BMB | 1 |
BSA | 2 |
BSC | 1 |
C2B | 1 |
CBB | 1 |
CBC | 1 |
CBT | 1 |
CPT | 2 |
CSB | 1 |
CT2 | 2 |
G | 1 |
GMX | 2 |
GSH | 1 |
HDK | 2 |
HS2 | 1 |
HS3 | 1 |
IMN | 1 |
MCC | 1 |
MID | 1 |
NSA | 2 |
NSB | 2 |
NUT | 1 |
PH2 | 1 |
RC1 | 1 |
Foundation grant holder application pressure
Foundation grant holder application pressure
Figure A: Proportion of applications
Figure A: Long description
PRC | Proportion of applications from Foundation grant holders (%) | Number of Foundation grant holder applications |
---|---|---|
C2B | 8.6 | 3 |
NSB | 6.5 | 3 |
IMN | 5.1 | 3 |
MCC | 4.8 | 2 |
NSA | 3.4 | 2 |
GMX | 2.8 | 1 |
BSA | 2.7 | 1 |
CBB | 2.7 | 1 |
DOL | 2.6 | 1 |
BSC | 2.3 | 1 |
CBT | 1.9 | 1 |
G | 1.9 | 1 |
BCA | 1.5 | 1 |
PH2 | 1.4 | 1 |
BE2 | 0.0 | 0 |
BMA | 0.0 | 0 |
BMB | 0.0 | 0 |
BME | 0.0 | 0 |
BS2 | 0.0 | 0 |
BSB | 0.0 | 0 |
CA2 | 0.0 | 0 |
CB1 | 0.0 | 0 |
CB2 | 0.0 | 0 |
CBC | 0.0 | 0 |
CHI | 0.0 | 0 |
CIA | 0.0 | 0 |
CIB | 0.0 | 0 |
CIC | 0.0 | 0 |
CID | 0.0 | 0 |
CMZ | 0.0 | 0 |
CPT | 0.0 | 0 |
CSA | 0.0 | 0 |
CSB | 0.0 | 0 |
CSC | 0.0 | 0 |
CT2 | 0.0 | 0 |
GSH | 0.0 | 0 |
HDK | 0.0 | 0 |
HLE | 0.0 | 0 |
HPM | 0.0 | 0 |
HS1 | 0.0 | 0 |
HS2 | 0.0 | 0 |
HS3 | 0.0 | 0 |
IHR | 0.0 | 0 |
KTR | 0.0 | 0 |
MID | 0.0 | 0 |
MOV | 0.0 | 0 |
MPI | 0.0 | 0 |
NUT | 0.0 | 0 |
PB1 | 0.0 | 0 |
PH1 | 0.0 | 0 |
PS | 0.0 | 0 |
PT | 0.0 | 0 |
RC1 | 0.0 | 0 |
RC2 | 0.0 | 0 |
RS | 0.0 | 0 |
SDA | 0.0 | 0 |
TIR | 0.0 | 0 |
VVP | 0.0 | 0 |
Figure B: Proportion of fully funded grants
Figure B: Long description
PRC | Proportion of fully funded grants awarded to Foundation grant holders (%) | Number of fully funded Foundation grant holders |
---|---|---|
C2B | 0.0 | 0 |
NSB | 33.3 | 2 |
IMN | 12.5 | 1 |
MCC | 16.7 | 1 |
NSA | 11.1 | 1 |
GMX | 0.0 | 0 |
BSA | 16.7 | 1 |
CBB | 0.0 | 0 |
DOL | 0.0 | 0 |
BSC | 14.3 | 1 |
CBT | 0.0 | 0 |
G | 0.0 | 0 |
BCA | 0.0 | 0 |
PH2 | 0.0 | 0 |
BE2 | 0.0 | 0 |
BMA | 0.0 | 0 |
BMB | 0.0 | 0 |
BME | 0.0 | 0 |
BS2 | 0.0 | 0 |
BSB | 0.0 | 0 |
CA2 | 0.0 | 0 |
CB1 | 0.0 | 0 |
CB2 | 0.0 | 0 |
CBC | 0.0 | 0 |
CHI | 0.0 | 0 |
CIA | 0.0 | 0 |
CIB | 0.0 | 0 |
CIC | 0.0 | 0 |
CID | 0.0 | 0 |
CMZ | 0.0 | 0 |
CPT | 0.0 | 0 |
CSA | 0.0 | 0 |
CSB | 0.0 | 0 |
CSC | 0.0 | 0 |
CT2 | 0.0 | 0 |
GSH | 0.0 | 0 |
HDK | 0.0 | 0 |
HLE | 0.0 | 0 |
HPM | 0.0 | 0 |
HS1 | 0.0 | 0 |
HS2 | 0.0 | 0 |
HS3 | 0.0 | 0 |
IHR | 0.0 | 0 |
KTR | 0.0 | 0 |
MID | 0.0 | 0 |
MOV | 0.0 | 0 |
MPI | 0.0 | 0 |
NUT | 0.0 | 0 |
PB1 | 0.0 | 0 |
PH1 | 0.0 | 0 |
PS | 0.0 | 0 |
PT | 0.0 | 0 |
RC1 | 0.0 | 0 |
RC2 | 0.0 | 0 |
RS | 0.0 | 0 |
SDA | 0.0 | 0 |
TIR | 0.0 | 0 |
VVP | 0.0 | 0 |
Past Foundation grant holder application pressure
Past Foundation grant holder application pressure
Figure A: Proportion of applications
Figure A: Long description
PRC | Proportion of applications from past Foundation grant holders (%) | Number of past Foundation grant holder applications |
---|---|---|
C2B | 2.9 | 1 |
NSB | 8.7 | 4 |
IMN | 5.1 | 3 |
MCC | 7.1 | 3 |
NSA | 8.6 | 5 |
GMX | 11.1 | 4 |
BSA | 5.4 | 2 |
CBB | 5.4 | 2 |
DOL | 5.3 | 2 |
BSC | 4.7 | 2 |
CBT | 7.5 | 4 |
G | 3.8 | 2 |
BCA | 7.7 | 5 |
PH2 | 4.1 | 3 |
BE2 | 9.1 | 3 |
BMA | 11.8 | 4 |
BMB | 7.4 | 2 |
BME | 2.4 | 1 |
BS2 | 2.6 | 1 |
BSB | 0.0 | 0 |
CA2 | 0.0 | 0 |
CB1 | 2.9 | 1 |
CB2 | 0.0 | 0 |
CBC | 6.5 | 2 |
CHI | 0.0 | 0 |
CIA | 1.6 | 1 |
CIB | 0.0 | 0 |
CIC | 0.0 | 0 |
CID | 2.9 | 1 |
CMZ | 5.0 | 2 |
CPT | 10.9 | 5 |
CSA | 0.0 | 0 |
CSB | 14.8 | 4 |
CSC | 0.0 | 0 |
CT2 | 8.9 | 4 |
GSH | 2.1 | 1 |
HDK | 16.0 | 4 |
HLE | 0.0 | 0 |
HPM | 2.1 | 1 |
HS1 | 0.0 | 0 |
HS2 | 1.6 | 1 |
HS3 | 4.3 | 2 |
IHR | 0.0 | 0 |
KTR | 2.1 | 1 |
MID | 5.0 | 3 |
MOV | 2.4 | 1 |
MPI | 2.3 | 1 |
NUT | 5.4 | 2 |
PB1 | 0.0 | 0 |
PH1 | 0.0 | 0 |
PS | 0.0 | 0 |
PT | 0.0 | 0 |
RC1 | 4.6 | 3 |
RC2 | 4.3 | 3 |
RS | 4.8 | 2 |
SDA | 0.0 | 0 |
TIR | 0.0 | 0 |
VVP | 4.3 | 2 |
Figure B: Proportion of fully funded grants
Figure B: Long description
PRC | Proportion of fully funded grants awarded to past Foundation grant holders (%) | Number of fully funded past Foundation grant holders |
---|---|---|
C2B | 20.0 | 1 |
NSB | 0.0 | 0 |
IMN | 0.0 | 0 |
MCC | 0.0 | 0 |
NSA | 11.1 | 1 |
GMX | 33.3 | 2 |
BSA | 16.7 | 1 |
CBB | 20.0 | 1 |
DOL | 0.0 | 0 |
BSC | 0.0 | 0 |
CBT | 12.5 | 1 |
G | 12.5 | 1 |
BCA | 0.0 | 0 |
PH2 | 9.1 | 1 |
BE2 | 20.0 | 1 |
BMA | 16.7 | 1 |
BMB | 25.0 | 1 |
BME | 0.0 | 0 |
BS2 | 0.0 | 0 |
BSB | 0.0 | 0 |
CA2 | 0.0 | 0 |
CB1 | 0.0 | 0 |
CB2 | 0.0 | 0 |
CBC | 25.0 | 1 |
CHI | 0.0 | 0 |
CIA | 0.0 | 0 |
CIB | 0.0 | 0 |
CIC | 0.0 | 0 |
CID | 0.0 | 0 |
CMZ | 0.0 | 0 |
CPT | 25.0 | 2 |
CSA | 0.0 | 0 |
CSB | 25.0 | 1 |
CSC | 0.0 | 0 |
CT2 | 25.0 | 2 |
GSH | 12.5 | 1 |
HDK | 40.0 | 2 |
HLE | 0.0 | 0 |
HPM | 0.0 | 0 |
HS1 | 0.0 | 0 |
HS2 | 11.1 | 1 |
HS3 | 11.1 | 1 |
IHR | 0.0 | 0 |
KTR | 0.0 | 0 |
MID | 12.5 | 1 |
MOV | 0.0 | 0 |
MPI | 0.0 | 0 |
NUT | 16.7 | 1 |
PB1 | 0.0 | 0 |
PH1 | 0.0 | 0 |
PS | 0.0 | 0 |
PT | 0.0 | 0 |
RC1 | 10.0 | 1 |
RC2 | 0.0 | 0 |
RS | 0.0 | 0 |
SDA | 0.0 | 0 |
TIR | 0.0 | 0 |
VVP | 0.0 | 0 |
Large grants awarded
Large grants are defined as being in the top 2% of total requested grant value within a competition. In this competition, the cutoff for large grants was $2,330,000. A total of 48 applications fell into this category. A budget of $16.25 million was available to fund those applications that are not from the Indigenous Health Research (IHR) panel. Large grants from the IHR panel are funded by IHR funds.
Category | Number of applications submitted | Percent of total applications submitted | Number of applications funded | Percent of applications funded | Success rateFootnote * | Average grant amount | Maximum grant amount |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All large grants | 48 | 2.0% | 9 | 2.4% | 18.8% | $2,282,760 | $3,534,300 |
Non-IHR large grants | 40 | 1.6% | 5 | 1.4% | 12.5% | $2,507,823 | $3,534,300 |
Equalization
In order to ensure equal representation of certain demographics in the funded projects we equalize the success rates for these groups. That means that the proportion of these groups in the funded projects is at least as high as the proportion of these groups in the applications.
Early Career Researchers
The success rate for early career researchers (ECRs) is equalized. This means that the proportion of ECRs funded will not be less than the proportion of ECR applicants to the competition. This equalization is for the competition as a whole, not by committee.
The total number of fully funded projects for applicants in this career stage went from 73 (before equalization) to 94 (after equalization).
French applications
The success rate for applications submitted in French is equalized. This means that the proportion of French applications funded will not be less than the proportion of French applications to the competition. This equalization is for the competition as a whole, not by committee.
The total number of fully funded projects for applications in French went from 4 (before equalization) to 7 (after equalization).
Female applicants
The success rate for female applicants is equalized. This means that the proportion of females funded will not be less than the proportion of female applicants to the competition. This equalization is for the competition as a whole, not by committee.
The total number of fully funded projects from female applicants went from 124 (before equalization) to 137 (after equalization).
Indigenous Health Research
All applications reviewed by the Indigenous Health Research committee went through an iterative peer review process.
Based on the recommendation of the review committee, 12 Indigenous health research projects were awarded funding. CIHR is proud to support these projects as part of its commitment to invest 4.6% of its annual budget in Indigenous health research.
Bridge Grants and Priority Announcements
There were no Bridge Grants awarded in addition to the 373 fully funded grants. There were 68 Priority Announcement grants funded for a total of $7,600,000 as well as 5 supplemental prizes for a total of $210,000.
Budget Size and Project Length
Category | Average total budget | Change from historical (total budget) | Average duration (years) | Change from historical (duration) | Average annual amount | Change from historical (annual amount) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All Requests | $1,087,768 | +$117,466 | 4.30 | +0.01 | $247,871 | +$26,012 |
Funded applications (requested) | $1,152,802 | +$117,941 | 4.42 | 0 | $255,857 | +$25,291 |
Funded applications (awarded) | $870,701 | +$98,965 | 4.42 | +0.02 | $193,225 | +$20,778 |
Peer Review
Details about the Project Grant: Spring 2024 peer review participants are available separately.
- Date modified: