Health Research Roadmap II: Capturing Innovation to Produce Better Health and Health Care for Canadians – Long descriptions

Figure i. Overview of CIHR’s three strategic directions

Roadmap II

Capturing Innovation to Produce Better Health and Health Care for Canadians

Promoting Excellence, Creativity and Breadth in Health Research and Knowledge Translation

Mobilizing Health Research for Transformation and Impact

Achieving Organizational Excellence

« Back to figure i

Figure ii. CIHR’s health and health system research priorities for 2014-15 to 2018-19

  1. Research Priority A: Enhanced patient experiences and outcomes through health innovation

    This research priority focuses on accelerating the discovery, development, evaluation and integration of health innovations into practice so that patients receive the right treatments at the right time.

  2. Research Priority B: Health and wellness for Aboriginal peoples

    This research priority focuses on supporting the health and wellness goals of Aboriginal peoples through shared research leadership and the establishment of culturally sensitive policies and interventions.

  3. Research Priority C: A healthier future through preventive action

    This research priority focuses on a proactive approach to understanding and addressing the causes of ill health, and on supporting physical and mental wellness at the individual, population and system levels.

  4. Research Priority D: Improved quality of life for persons living with chronic conditions

    This research priority focuses on understanding multiple, co-existing chronic conditions, and on supporting integrated solutions that enable Canadians to continue to participate actively in society.

« Back to figure ii

Figure 1. Canada’s Health Research Enterprise: Delivering the benefits of health research to Canadians. Researchers are found in all of these groups.

Delivering the Benefits of Health Research to Canadians

« Back to figure 1

Figure 2. Key components of the College of Reviewers

College of Reviewers:

« Back to figure 2

Figure 3. Examples of research areas and knowledge translation activities for Research Priority A: Enhanced patient experiences and outcomes through health innovation

Health innovations

Discovery and development

Evaluation

Implementation and scale-up

« Back to figure 3

Figure 4. Examples of research areas and knowledge translation activities for Research Priority B: Health and wellness for Aboriginal peoples

Aboriginal peoples’ health

Shared leadership

Culturally sensitive policies and interventions

Sharing knowledge across jurisdictions and populations

« Back to figure 4

Figure 5. Examples of research areas and knowledge translation activities for Research Priority C: Promoting a healthier future through preventive action

Health promotion and prevention

Discovery and understanding

Health promotion

Disease prevention

« Back to figure 5

Figure 6. Examples of research areas and knowledge translation activities for Research Priority D: Improved quality of life for persons living with chronic conditions

Management and treatment of chronic conditions

Discover and understanding

Primary and acute health care

Long-term management

« Back to figure 6

Figure 7. Incorporation of eHealth across the four research priority areas

Research for evidence-based development, evaluation and integration of eHealth innovations

Innovations that... Improve... Examples...
eHealth for enhanced patient experiences and outcomes Connect providers, patients and disparate sources of data and information Diagnostic accuracy; treatment appropriateness; accountability of care
  • E-records
  • Gene banks
  • E-diagnosis
  • E-decision support
eHealth for health and wellness in Aboriginal peoples Include citizen-informed, culturally sensitive, population-specific design and content Access to health care across social, geographical or cultural contexts
  • E-learning
  • E-community
  • Telemedicine
  • Remote technologies
eHealth for a healthier future through preventive action Provide analytical and predictive modelling using data integrated across systems Evidence-informed preventive action at the individual, system and population levels
  • My-health
  • Surveillance platforms
  • E-detection
  • eHealth map
eHealth for enhanced quality of life for persons living with chronic conditions Enable access to personal health information, support networks and care providers Citizen empowerment in health maintenance and autonomy at home and at work
  • E-biometrics
  • E-network
  • Smart home/office
  • E-wear/clothing

« Back to figure 7

Figure 8. CIHR performance measurement regime and its relationship to Roadmap II

Column 1

CIHR performance measurement regime (approximately 100 indicators)

Column 2

CAHS framework and accountability

Column 3

Reporting timeframe

Column 4

Types of reports

CIHR action plans and performance measurement framework

Roadmap II high-level performance measurement framework

Performance measurement framework for signature and other strategic initiatives

« Back to figure 8

Table 1. Expected outcomes and performance indicators for Roadmap II

Expected Outcomes Performance Indicators
To promote excellence, creativity and breadth in health research, and mobilize health research for transformation and impact % of expendituresFootnote iiiiii no. of grantsFootnote iiiiii no. of researchers fundedFootnote iiiiii no. of publicationsFootnote iviv Citation of findings in scientific and non-scientific publicationsFootnote iiiiii,Footnote iviv Field analysis of citationsFootnote iiiiii,Footnote vv Share of top 5% cited papers acknowledging CIHR Average relative citations (ARC)Footnote iiiiii % of grants reporting contribution to more effective health services and productsFootnote iiiiii % of grants reporting contribution to improved health of CanadiansFootnote iviv % of grants reporting participation of stakeholders in the research processFootnote vivi % of grants reporting new method, new theory or replication of findingsFootnote iiiiii % of grants reporting application of findingsFootnote iiiiii % of grants reporting potential commercialization outcomesFootnote iiiiii Co-author analysis of publicationsFootnote iiiiii,Footnote vivi % of trainees obtaining post-doctoral fellowship in the top 50 highest ranking universities % of trainees employed in the Canadian research enterpriseFootnote viivii no. of reviewersFootnote iiiiii % of appropriate reviewer assignments Ratio of CIHR to Partner investmentFootnote vivi no. of partnership agreementsFootnote vivi no. of stakeholders involved in CIHR governance & advisory committeesFootnote viiiviii
Strategic Direction 1 Diverse health-related projects and programs of research advance knowledge and/or improve health care, health systems, health or economic outcomes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No No No No No No No No
Diverse research leaders across the spectrum of health No No Yes No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No
Integration of stakeholdersFootnote vivi into the research process No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No Yes No No No No No No No
A base of well-trained reviewers that represent diverse expertise, experiences and perspectives No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes No No No
Trainees are leaders in the Canadian Health Research Enterprise No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes No No No No No
Strategic Direction 2 Health Innovation Knowledge informs the development of diagnostic, therapeutic, clinical, technological and health system solutions Yes No No Yes No No No No No No No Yes No Yes No No No No No No No No
Evidence informs the implementation of new diagnostic, therapeutic, clinical, technological and health system solutions No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No No No No No No No No No
Aboriginal Peoples’ Health Indigenous knowledge and ways of knowing are an integral part of Indigenous health research Yes No No Yes No No No No No No Yes No No No Yes No No No No No No No
Knowledge from Aboriginal research is applied to other relevant settings and health issues No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No
Health Promotion & Prevention Knowledge of biological, psychological, social, environmental and economic determinants of health is advanced Yes No No Yes No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No
Evidence-informed intersectoral health promotion and disease prevention interventions are implemented No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No
Man. & Treat. of Chronic Conditions Knowledge of diagnosis and treatment barriers for multiple, co-existing chronic conditions is advanced Yes No No Yes No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No
Evidence-informed integrated care approaches improve the diagnosis, monitoring and treatment of multiple, co-existing chronic conditions No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No
Reaping Benefits from Strategic Alliances Stakeholders are engaged in CIHR decision making (e.g. priority setting, policies, programs and initiatives) No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes
CIHR builds collaborative relationships with health and out-of-health sector stakeholders No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes Yes
Canadian researchers are leaders and innovators in international research initiatives No Yes No No No No Yes No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No Yes No
Knowledge from collaborative research in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) is applied to the Canadian context No No No No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No No No Yes No No No No No No No

« Back to table 1

Footnotes

Footnote iii

To be reported by a) research area: research areas across the spectrum of health, including ethics research, knowledge translation science; and in CIHR priority areas: health innovation, aboriginal research, health promotion and disease prevention, management of chronic conditions, and eHealth; b) type of research (discovery, demonstration, validation and application) and c) type of grantee/awardee, including gender, age or other demographics, where applicable.

iii

Footnote iv

CIHR is currently pilot testing methodologies to access, search and report on citations to funded research in ‘non-journal’ publications such as policies and guidelines.

iv

Footnote v

Field analysis identifies whether findings are taken up by other disciplines.

v

Footnote vi

To be reported by stakeholder type, region and sector.

vi

Footnote vii

To be reported by sector and position. This indicator is currently based upon the Banting Postdoctoral Fellowships program end-of-award survey.

vii

Footnote viii

Examples of stakeholders include health care/health system/public health practitioners, patients or consumers of the health system/care, study stakeholders, health system/care managers, health system/care professional organizations, federal/provincial representatives, community/municipal organizations, consumer groups, charitable organizations, industry, the media; and other researchers/academics (excluding study stakeholders).

viii

Date modified: